Thursday, May 28, 2009

Dead TV

I’ve always been a fan of reading the source material for movies. Not just sci-fi and fantasy but anything really. I think I first developed the habit after seeing “Howard’s End” and then equally adoring the book. I enjoy rereading each Harry Potter before its movie comes out and trying to guess the changes that the screenwriters had to make. It’s gotten to the point where I will read something I’ve been vaguely aware of or “meaning to” get to and once I hear that an adaptation is in the works then I’ll hurry up and check it out of the library.

I’ve been stuck in a vampire fiction rut for a good year now. It’s easy. And there are so many series to choose from that once I start one I don’t have to think very hard about what my next book will be. Check out the next one in the list!

Well, now it seems these two things are converging on me. Only not movie adaptions but rather television. The only television series that I’ve also read the source books from is The Dresden Files. I saw the show before I started reading the books and I haven’t gone back to rewatch the episodes to see how closely they hewed to the novels. I am aware of some character changes but I’ve got the two mentally categorized as fairly separate entities so it doesn’t really bother me. Plus, since I am already in the habit of doing mental script adaptations, I think I’m much more accepting of necessary alterations than the typical rabid fanatic.

I started reading the Southern Vampire Mysteries, also known as the Sookie Stackhouse series, once I found out that HBO’s show True Blood was based on them. The DVDs of the first season just came out and I’m excited to start watching. I’m hesitant, however, because I don’t wait to spoil myself – for the show or for the books! I’ve only read the first three and I don’t know how much the show has deviated from the plots. This should be my first experiment. The next series to be adapted is Anita Blake. I’ve gotten through the first four of those and the mini-series-as-series-pilot hasn’t even been filmed yet. So I should be quite a ways into it by the time it airs. The final series, however, I think I’ll skip entirely. I think I might be past the suggested read-by age for The Vampire Diaries. Sure, I devoured Twilight but then I turned into an LOLfan after that ghastly fourth offering. And the CW show they’re basing on the books seems just too…Twilight angst times Gossip Girl teens and I don’t know that I can take it. Boone on Lost did nothing for me so having him cast as a vamp is just not enough of a draw. Should be interesting to see if it makes as big of a splash in the zeitgeist as Twilight did.

5 comments:

Jennifer said...

It does seem that vamps are hot right now (again), and I really do like the first three Twilight books (I pretend the fourth doesn't exist), but the movie really lacked the inside-their-head chatter that was really important to the story. I did like the movie for the most part, and I wish I had your skill to see how they'd have to make changes so I wouldn't hate seeing movies after the books!

I do like reading the source books too, if I love the movie, so I can relate to that. Like with the 'Sookie Stackhouse' series on HBO, I only read the first book because I'm afraid I'll ruin the suspense of the second season! They seem to follow pretty closely, with more sex for TV, so you could spoil it for yourself...unlike the Twilight book to movie adaptation!

Sorry, I could go on and on about books to movies and just books all day long! Sometimes I go see a movie and I realize I read the book a few years ago! I love this topic.

belsum said...

Heh. Glad to have a topic to bring you out of hiding! I'm hoping that New Moon is a better film than Twilight turned out to be. The direction was just so wooden and you're absolutely right that it was missing the internal dialogue. Then again, I actually preferred what was posted of Midnight Sun to Twilight itself and think it would have been a much stronger story to keep it from Edward's perspective. Probably wouldn't have grabbed the teenage girls the same way though. Heh.

Have you seen the whole first season of True Blood then? There's quite a bit of sex, particularly in the second book, so I'm curious to see what "more sex for TV" means. It's not at all graphic so maybe that's the difference? I've seen joking that it's a good thing the Anita Blake series won't be on Cinemax. Apparently the book series is notorious for devolving into porn. I haven't gotten to that point yet but I think the next book has the first sex scene. Should be interesting to learn if it's that raunchy right away or if it takes a few more titles to get there.

superbadfriend said...

Hey darlin', Have you ever read this site? http://www.donedealpro.com/default.aspx I don't read it much anymore, but it's fun to see what scripts or adaptations have sold. (required registration)

Attempted to watch the premiere of True Blood the day it aired and for some reason it didn't hold my attention. Planned on giving it another go this summer. Looks like I need to bump that up a bit.

Also, New Moon was incredibly depressing, and I too preferred Edward's perspective in Midnight Sun.

belsum said...

Interesting site. I think Chris might have mentioned it before?

I just found out that the first season of True Blood basically follows the plot of the first book. So maybe you'd like it better after reading "Dead Until Dark"? I'll probably do reviews of each episode on my LJ so I'll be sure to send you a link.

I hope the movie of New Moon doesn't affect you the same way the book did. Maybe being aware of the suppression will prevent the visceral reaction?

Anonymous said...

HAPPY BIRTHDAY!